Finance
minister Arun Jaitley at a press conference after the 14th Finance Commission
report. The Seventh Pay Commission will submit its report by October 2015.
Photo: AP
New
Delhi: After the recommendations of the Fourteenth Finance Commission (FFC)
forced the government to reduce its plan expenditure in the 2015-16 budget, the
Union finance ministry fears its revenues will remain constrained in 2016-17 as
well since it has to absorb the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission
(SPC) in that year.
The
SPC will submit its report by October 2015.
“The
7th Pay Commission impact may have to be absorbed in 2016-17. The phase of
consolidation, extended by one year, will also be spanning out in this period.
Thus, in the medium-term framework, the fiscal position will continue to be
stressed,” the finance ministry said in the macroeconomic framework statement
laid before Parliament along with the budget on Saturday.
The
Union Budget reduced the plan expenditure for the first time in many years by Rs.2,657
crore to Rs.4.7 trillion in 2015-16 from the revised estimate of 2014-15, as
the centre shared an additional Rs.1.86 trillion with states. The Finance
Commission has raised the untied share of states in net central taxes to 42%
from 32%.
The
tight fiscal situation forced the government to revise its fiscal consolidation
road map and set a less ambitious fiscal deficit target of 3.9% of the gross
domestic product (GDP) for 2015-16 against the earlier target of 3.6% set in
last year’s budget.
The
fiscal deficit of 4.1% for 2014-15 was also achieved through a sharp reduction
in plan expenditure up to Rs.1.1 trillion. Finance minister Arun Jaitley
in his budget speech said he had deferred the 3% fiscal deficit target to
fiscal 2017-18 from 2016-17.
The
government appointed the Seventh Pay Commission on 28 February 2014 under
chairman justice Ashok Kumar
Mathur with a timeline of 18 months to make its recommendations.
Though the deadline for submitting the report ends in August this year, the SPC
is likely to seek extension till October.
The
Sixth Pay Commission which was constituted in October 2006 had submitted its
report in March 2008.
As
a result of the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission, pay and allowances
of the Union government employees more than doubled between 2007-08 and
2011-12—from Rs.74,647 crore to Rs.166,792 crore, according to the Fourteenth
Finance Commission estimates.
“As
a ratio of GDP, it jumped from a little over 0.9% in 2007-08 to 1.2% in 2008-09
and about 1.4% in 2009-10 on account of both pay revision and payment of
arrears. However, it moderated to little over 1% in 2012-13,” the Finance
Commission said.
The
recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission were implemented by states with a
delay mainly between 2009-10 and 2011-12, with “significant expenditure outgo”
in arrears on both pay and pension counts, the FFC said.
The
FFC said that while the finance ministry projects an increase in pension
payments by 8.7% in 2015-16, a 30% increase is expected in 2016-17 on account
of the impact of the Seventh Pay Commission, followed by an annual growth rate
of 8% in subsequent years.
However,
it maintained that given the variations across states and the lack of knowledge
about the probable design and quantum of award of the Seventh Pay Commission,
it is neither feasible, nor practicable, to arrive at any reasonable forecast
of the impact of the pay revision on the Union government or the states.
“Further, any attempt to fix a number in this regard, within the ambit of our
recommendations, carries the unavoidable risk of raising undue expectations,”
added the Finance Commission.
A
senior Pay Commission official, speaking under condition of anonymity, said its
recommendations will surely have significant impact on the revenues of the
central government. “The 14th Finance Commission was at a disadvantage since it
did not have the benefit of the recommendations of the Pay Commission unlike
its predecessors,” he added.
N.R.
Bhanumurthy, professor at the National Institute of Public Finance
and Policy, said the FFC has tried to factor in the impact of the
recommendations of the SPC on the central government expenses. “The FFC report
shows the capital outlay of the central government will dip in 2016-17 to 1.4%
of GDP from 1.64% a year ago due to the implementation of the Pay Commission
recommendation before it starts rising to 2.9% of GDP by 2019-20,” he added.
The
FFC said that all states had asked it to provide a cushion for the pay revision
likely during the award period. The FFC advocated for a consultative mechanism
between the centre and states, through a forum such as the Inter-State Council,
to evolve a national policy for salaries and emoluments.
The
FFC also recommended that pay commissions be designated as Pay and Productivity
Commissions, with a clear mandate to recommend measures to improve productivity
of employees, in conjunction with pay revisions. “We recommend the linking of
pay with productivity, with a simultaneous focus on technology, skills and
incentives. We urge that, in future, additional remuneration be linked to
increase in productivity,” it said.
The
Pay Commission official quoted earlier said it has been mandated to recommend
incentive schemes to reward excellence in productivity, performance and
integrity, which it will do. “Though previous Pay Commissions have talked about
linking pay with productivity, the earlier governments have not accepted such
recommendations. Since this government has shown strong political will, we hope
they will accept our recommendations,” he added.
Source : http://www.livemint.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment